Mako means more
More procedures. Greater possibilites.
The next generation of Mako isn’t just about what it does. It’s about who it serves – more surgeons, more patients, across more specialties and more procedures. Mako means more than ever. Let us show you all the possibilities.
Are you ready for more?
Are you ready for more?
Expect more with SmartRobotics™
SmartRobotics is designed to elevate surgeon control and confidence and optimize implant placement by combining 3D CT-based planning and AccuStop™ haptic technology.1
?$max_width_1440$ "Mako 4 System with Mako Total Knee software and the Q Guidance System")
Introducing the latest advancements in SmartRobotics™
More applications in a single system
Mako Total Knee
The unique features of Mako Total Knee SmartRobotics™ are designed to help you optimize Triathlon component positioning and enhance functional outcomes.2 Intraoperatively, surgeons have the ability to assess soft tissue laxities and adjust the placement of implants to achieve the final position before cuts. With the use of AccuStop™ haptic technology, studies have demonstrated more pristine bone resections,4 less soft tissue damage4 and greater bone preservation when compared to manual cutting blocks.5
Mako Total Hip
Enhance your Mako Total Hip experience through patient-specific planning to enable more accurate implant positioning to plan when compared to traditional techniques.6 Surgeons can visualize potential impingement by looking at the changes to their patient’s pelvic tilt in the sitting, standing and supine positioning. Using AccuStop™ haptic technology and a patient specific CT scan, Mako Total Hip enables single stage reaming and guided cup impaction to help promote accurate implant placement to plan.7
Mako Partial Knee
Mako Partial Knee helps enable the surgeon to dynamically balance soft tissue tensioning intraoperatively, with the goal of recreating natural knee kinematics. Clinical studies have shown that Mako Partial Knee has the potential to reproducibly deliver component placement that is accurate to the 3D patient-specific preoperative plans,8,9 reduce damage to the surrounding soft tissue through AccuStop™ haptic technology10, and to help surgeons reestablish soft tissue balance using dynamic joint balancing.11
Mako Spine
Mako Spine is designed to give surgeons confidence that they’re executing their procedure to plan and support correct level selection with visual level indication and haptic feedback. Once the surgeon has moved the robotic-arm to the area of interest and a vertebral level is identified, Mako Spine is designed to leverage AccuStop™ haptic technology to enable alignment to, and help provide stability within, the haptic boundaries of a pre-planned trajectory that has been suggested by the software and confirmed by the surgeon, based on the patient’s unique anatomy.
More innovation to help improve your experience
Mako 4
One system. More procedures.
The latest advancement in SmartRobotics™ is here. Our fourth generation Mako System is a single system that delivers more - more capabilities and more applications - and is designed to offer a premium clinical and operational experience when compared to manual surgery across Mako Total Hip, Total Knee, Partial Knee and Spine.
Get more with Mako 4.
Integrated with Stryker's Q Guidance System
Mako 4 integrates Stryker’s Q Guidance System which is built on over 20 years of experience developing guidance technologies. In addition to Mako SmartRobotics, the versatility of the Q Guidance System helps to streamline our technologies across multiple specialties including cranial, spine, and orthopaedics.
To learn more about the Q Guidance System click here.
Q Guidance System display monitors
Large display monitor for enhanced intraoperative visibility designed to improve user experience.
FP8000 camera
Our proprietary FP8000 camera features a wide field of view for enhanced probe and array visibility and operates up to 15x faster than leading competitor’s cameras1 in spine applications.
Small OR footprint
Space-efficient design for ease of transport, setup and turnover.
More integrated technologies
Mako Spine with Copilot's automatic depth stop
Mako Spine's lock-and-hold feature is designed to help provide stability within haptic boundaries and take Copilot's automatic depth stop capability to the next level, enabling confidence during pedicle preparation and screw placement in spinal procedures.
MICS 3
Built on the legacy of Stryker’s System 9 power tools, the MICS 3 handpiece, attachments, and blades are designed for an enhanced cutting experience in your Total Knee, Partial Knee, and Total Hip procedures.
Mako SmartRobotics™
Global statistics through 2024
1.5 million+
Mako procedures
have been performed across the globe*
45+ countries
Mako Systems installed in over 45 countries
19 years
of robotic-arm assisted surgery experience
500+
published, peer reviewed studies
1,500+
patents
and patent applications established globally
* Stryker's internal data on file 2024
See Mako SmartRobotics™ in action!
This contact form is intended for healthcare professionals. If you’re a patient looking to contact us, please go here.
Thank you!
References:
- Stryker data on file.
- Kayani B, Konan S, Tahmassebi J, Pietrzak JRT, Haddad FS. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved early functional recovery and reduced time to hospital discharge compared with conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. The Bone and Joint Journal. 2018;100-B:930-7.
- Kleeblad LJ, Borus T, Coon T, Dounchis J, Nguyen J, Pearle A. Midterm survivorship and patient satisfaction of robotic-arm assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a multicenter study. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2018:1-8.
- Kayani B, Konan S, Pietrzak JRT, Haddad FS. Iatrogenic bone and soft tissue trauma in robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study and validation of a new classification system. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(8):2496-2501. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.042
- Hozack WJ. Multicentre analysis of outcomes after robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J:Orthop Proc. 2018;100-B(Supp_12):38.
- Domb B, Redmond J, Louis S, Alden K, Daley R, LaReau J, et al. Accuracy of component positioning in 1980 total hip arthroplasties: a comparative analysis by surgical technique and mode of guidance. The Journal of Arthoplasty. 30(2015)2208-2218.
- Domb BG, El Bitar YF, Sadik AY, Stake CE, Botser IB. Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional acetabular cup placement in THA: a matched-pair controlled study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(1):329-336. doi:10.1007/s11999-013-3253-7
- Bell SW, Anthony I, Jones B, MacLean A, Rowe P, Blyth M. Improved accuracy of component positioning with robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: data from a prospective, randomized controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(8): 627-635. doi:10.2106/JBJS.15.00664
- Kayani B, Konan S, Pietrzak JRT, Huq SS, Tahmassebi J, Haddad FS. The learning curve associated with robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. Bone Joint J. 2018;100-B(8):1033-1042. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.100B8.BJJ-2018-0040.R1
- Hampp EL, Scholl L, Faizan A, Sodhi N, Mont MA, Westrich G. Comparison of Iatrogenic Soft Tissue Trauma in Robotic-Assisted versus Manual Partial Knee Arthroplasty [published online ahead of print, 2021 Aug 5]. Surg Technol Int. 2021;39:sti39/1465. doi:10.52198/21.STI.39.OS1465
- Catani F., Zambianchi F., Marcovigi A., Franceschi G., Nardacchione R. Component positioning and soft-tissue tensioning influence clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a short-term follow-up study. Orthopaedic Proceedings Vol. 100-B, No. SUPP_12. Accessed online at https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/abs/10.1302/1358-992X.2018.12.003
JR-GSNPS-SYK-1643187