Cascadia Lateral 3D
Interbody System
The Cascadia Lateral 3D Interbody System includes a full range of implant sizes designed to accommodate the vertebral anatomy. This system is designed to work with the Ravine Lateral Access System, offering a full line of instrumentation for the direct lateral transpsoas approach. Lamellar 3D Titanium Technology incorporates 300-500 um longitudinal channels, which in conjunction with transverse windows, create an interconnected lattice designed to allow for bony integration [1,2].
Main features
- 3mm bulleted nose is designed to ease cage insertion [1]
- Reverse hourglass design allows for a large graft volume [1]
- Wide range of footprints available with parallel, 8°, 12°, 15°, 22°, and 28° lordoses
- 3-5 μm surface roughness to allow for direct bony ongrowth [1,2]
- Roughened titanium surfaces have been shown to demonstrate increased protein expression in contrast to smooth titanium surfaces [3,4,5]
Related products
Cayman Minimally Invasive
The Cayman Minimally Invasive (MI) Plate System is specifically designed for insertion through the Ravine Lateral Access System’s true muscle-splitting Retractor. The single-level, stackable design allows for one-level and multi-level constructs.
Learn more
Cayman United
The Cayman United Plate System is specifically designed for rigid fixation to the Cascadia Lateral 3D line of interbody implants. The single-level, one and two-hole plate configurations allow for a customisable construct from the lateral approach to help achieve sagittal balance.
Learn moreReferences:
- Test Report TR-1220
- Loh QL and Choong C. “Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue-engineering applications: Role of porosity and pore size.” Tissue Engineering Part B 19 (2013): 485-502.
- Karande TS, Kaufmann JM, and Agrawal CM. “Chapter 3: Functions and Requirements of Synthetic Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering.” Nanotechnology and Regenerative Engineering: The Scaffold, Second Edition. Ed. CT Laurencin and LS Nair. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2014. Pages 63-102.
- Bobyn JD, Pilliar RM, Cameron HU, and Weatherly GC. “The optimum pore size for the fixation of porous-surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone.” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 150 (1980): 263-270.
- Karageorgiou V and Kaplan D. “Porosity of 3D biomaterials scaffolds and osteogenesis.” Biomaterials 26 (2005): 5474-5491.
This document is intended solely for the use of healthcare professionals. The products depicted are in accordance with applicable Regulations and Directives. Please find our full product disclaimer here.
PRTTL-WB-35_29853